홈 / 서강동연소식 / 공지사항
공지사항
[초청강연회] 윤리적 개발원조 만들기? : 라오스와 미얀마에서 바라본 글로벌 새마을운동과 한국 개발주의 정신
작성자
sieas
작성일
2018-09-18 09:42
조회
388
동아연구소가 서강 국제한국학 선도센터와 공동으로 아래와 같은 초청강연회를 개최합니다.
많은 관심과 참여 부탁드립니다.
제목 : 윤리적 개발원조 만들기? : 라오스와 미얀마에서 바라본 글로벌 새마을운동과 한국 개발주의 정신
발표자 : Jakkrit Sangkhamanee
소속 : 태국 쭐라롱콘 대학교 정치학과 교수
일시 : 2018년 9월 28일(금) 오후16:00~17:30
장소 : 다산관 D209B
영문 초록 : This talk is a reflection based on my research, a work-in-progress, on the role of Korean ODA and Saemaul Undong (SMU) projects in development intervention outside Korea. Based on case studies in Laos and Myanmar, I look into the processes of transfer and implementation of Korean’s experience in rural development, dated back to the authoritarian regime of Park Chung-Hee, and argue for the distinctiveness of Korean development intervention, characterised by the strong imposition of Saemaul Undong spirits onto local authorities and communities in recipient countries. I argue that, while the Korean’s rural development program, like other donors', seems to render complex development issues technical, examining its implementation at the ground reveals a much more nuanced aspect of ethical re-education and enforcement.
많은 관심과 참여 부탁드립니다.
제목 : 윤리적 개발원조 만들기? : 라오스와 미얀마에서 바라본 글로벌 새마을운동과 한국 개발주의 정신
발표자 : Jakkrit Sangkhamanee
소속 : 태국 쭐라롱콘 대학교 정치학과 교수
일시 : 2018년 9월 28일(금) 오후16:00~17:30
장소 : 다산관 D209B
영문 초록 : This talk is a reflection based on my research, a work-in-progress, on the role of Korean ODA and Saemaul Undong (SMU) projects in development intervention outside Korea. Based on case studies in Laos and Myanmar, I look into the processes of transfer and implementation of Korean’s experience in rural development, dated back to the authoritarian regime of Park Chung-Hee, and argue for the distinctiveness of Korean development intervention, characterised by the strong imposition of Saemaul Undong spirits onto local authorities and communities in recipient countries. I argue that, while the Korean’s rural development program, like other donors', seems to render complex development issues technical, examining its implementation at the ground reveals a much more nuanced aspect of ethical re-education and enforcement.